ILLINOIS LEGAL NEWS & VIDEOS

Rev. Jesse Jackson, Sr. Endorses Bob Fioretti for Cook County State’s Attorney

The recent endorsement of Republican Bob Fioretti for Cook County State’s Attorney by civil rights icon Reverend Jesse Jackson Sr. has sparked significant political debate in Cook County. Traditionally a strong supporter of Democratic candidates, Jackson’s decision to back Fioretti marks a significant departure and emphasizes the candidate’s civil rights record and history of community advocacy.

Jackson praised Fioretti as someone who has been a “champion” for the community through his roles as an alderman, civil rights lawyer, and advocate for the wrongfully convicted. He emphasized that his endorsement is not about party loyalty but rather choosing the right individual for the community, citing Fioretti’s commitment to “fairness, equality, and diversity”.

The endorsement has heightened scrutiny on Fioretti’s opponent, Eileen O’Neill Burke, a retired Illinois Appellate Court justice. Burke has been criticized for her handling of a racially charged case from the 1990s in which she prosecuted an 11-year-old African-American boy for murder, using what was later determined to be a coerced confession. This incident has been highlighted as disqualifying by Jackson, who cited it as evidence of racial bias.

The endorsement is also notable as it echoes some of the criticism Burke faced during the Democratic primary, where other prominent black Democratic leaders expressed concerns about her record. The race between Fioretti and Burke has become one of the more contentious local elections, with Jackson’s support potentially swaying voters in a predominantly Democratic county.

Fioretti, who has positioned himself as a centrist Republican, emphasized his commitment to law and order while respecting civil rights. His campaign is focused on building a “centrist movement” aimed at safer communities and a more just legal system.

Chicago’s Gun Violence in 2024: A City in Crisis

Gun violence continues to plague Chicago, with alarming statistics emerging in 2024. The city, often known for its rich cultural and historical significance, is struggling with increasing incidents of shootings. Many neighborhoods are caught in the crossfire, with the causes ranging from gang conflicts, drug-related crimes, to systemic socio-economic issues like poverty and lack of access to education.

The local government and community leaders are working tirelessly to address these problems, with initiatives focused on policing reform, community outreach programs, and investing in youth services. Yet, the challenge remains significant. Weekly updates track the escalating violence, revealing the harrowing reality many Chicagoans face daily.

Families in the most affected areas are calling for immediate action, from better gun control laws to more mental health resources. Community organizations are stepping up, providing safe spaces and educational opportunities, but without robust policy changes and better enforcement, the cycle of violence may persist.

Public figures, such as Mayor Brandon Johnson, are pushing for comprehensive solutions. However, balancing the safety of citizens with ensuring civil liberties remains a delicate act.

Chicago’s battle with gun violence isn’t just a local issue—it reflects broader national debates on gun control, police reform, and community-led safety measures. As we continue to track these developments, one thing is clear: ending gun violence in Chicago will require cooperation from every sector of society.

Attorney John Heiderscheidt Criticizes the Decision to Let ShotSpotter’s Contract Lapse

“It was a foolish decision to abandon Shotspotter technology, especially considering the Mayor is only now putting out an RFI to replace the technology,” said Attorney John Heiderscheidt of Subscription Lawyer. “His criticisms of the technology seem duplicitous and contradictory: if the technology is inherently bad because of surveillance, there’s no need for a replacement technology. If a replacement technology is necessary, the contract with Shotspotter should not have ended without an alternative place. This wrong decision will cost innocent victims their lives. Period.”

Attorney Heiderscheidt continued on, “The Mayor’s comparison of Shotspotter to a wasteful, walkie-talkie on a stick was the latest demonstration that he is completely unfit for the office he holds. The decision has led to near universal criticism in Chicago’s political circles. If the technology was good enough to keep party elites safe during the DNC, it is certainly good enough for all communities of Chicago. Day in and day out, this Mayor demonstrates total indifference to the well-being of regular, working-class Chicagoans and their families. Change cannot come to Chicago fast enough.” 

Data on Shotspotter can be found here: https://justicetechlab.org/shotspotter-data/

Challenging the Immigrant Crime Narrative: Insights from Recent Research

Recent discussions surrounding crime rates and immigrant populations have often been driven by fear and misconception. A study highlighted by WTTW News has brought to light a disconnect between the narrative surrounding immigrant crime and the actual data, challenging long-held beliefs.

The research emphasizes that, contrary to popular opinion, immigrants are not inherently more likely to commit crimes than native-born citizens. In fact, many studies indicate that immigrant communities often experience lower crime rates. This contradiction raises questions about the narratives perpetuated in media and political

The study analyzes crime statistics and demographic information, revealing trends that suggest immigrants contribute positively to community safety and economic vitality. The findings indicate that areas with higher immigrant populations tend to have lower overall crime rates, underscoring the potential benefits of immigration.

Media portrayals often sensationalize crimes involving immigrants, creating a skewed perception. This study calls for a more nuanced understanding, urging policymakers to consider data-driven insights rather than rely on stereotypes. The implications of these findings are significant, especially in shaping immigration policy and public opinion.

Attorney Heiderscheidt Comments on P. Diddy Sex Trafficking Arrest

Given the images of law enforcement raids that we saw at Mr. Combs’ residence earlier in the spring, it should not surprise anyone that he has been indicted on certain charges related to sex trafficking and racketeering. The timing raises questions about whether there is some orchestration between the defendant himself and government authorities in a broader investigation. Time will tell.

The indictment signals that law enforcement has concluded most aspects of its investigation of Mr. Combs’ activities. It will now be for defense lawyers to use pretrial procedural tools as well as the trial system if they choose, in an effort to best help Mr. Combs address the situation so that he can avoid criminal liability totally, or, at the very least, avoid exceptionally harsh sentencing.

If you are an immigrant or citizen in the United State facing a criminal investigation or criminal charges in Cook, DuPage, Kane, Kendall, Lasalle or Will County, and you want to know about your rights, reach out to us at the contact tab on our website.

Attorney Heiderscheidt’s Statement on the Anniversary of 9/11:

Like virtually all Americans, I remember September 11 all too well. The horrific images of skyscrapers collapsing on innocent New Yorkers from all walks of life remain etched in my memory.

I remember the sadness, horror, and despair in people’s faces. At the start of the morning, we were a nation enjoying the longest peace dividend in modern history. By the afternoon we were a nation at war, with a then-faceless enemy.

September 11 changed the course of American and human history. But what I also distinctly remember is that Americans chose to come together and unite behind our oldest traditions and ideals In defense of our nation, our people, and our way of life. On that day we were not Republicans or Democrats, Liberals or Conservatives, far-left or far-right. We were just, Americans. Dazed, bloodied, in the fog of war, but brothers and sisters united in the instinctual need for cooperation for survival.

Twenty-three years later, we face another such moment in history. A second Cold War has reopened in Europe, and a great religious war is breaking out in the Middle East. Our dollar buys less than it ever has, and goods, services, energy, and gasoline cost more than ever before. Freedoms enshrined in the Bill of Rights are denigrated as potentially harmful to society.

As we navigate a world that presents unique challenges from a paradigm of multipolarity and shifting economic realities, we can best serve our own people by doubling down on our commitment to freedom, civil liberty, and the rule of law. Though the seas may remain stormy, a commitment to these principles will see us through any storm or swail as one people, under God, indivisible, to new ports of prosperity and happiness.

Re-Imaging Sanctuary Policy in 2024

This article written by John Heiderscheidt originally appeared in The Southland Journal (Chicago, IL) — In a previous article for The Southland Journal, I argued that sanctuary policy needs to be re-imagined. Sanctuary policy is not new, but the landscape around the admission of new arrivals to the United States has changed radically since we first adopted local sanctuary policy under Harold Washington in 1985. More recently, former Il. Gov. Rauner signed legislation implementing a statewide sanctuary policy. Many Chicago and Cook County residents favor ending that policy entirely, though the Chicago City Council refused to submit the question to the people in 2023.

Ending sanctuary policy entirely in one fell swoop today would be as unwise as implementing sanctuary policy in one fell swoop was in 1985. It may satisfy our friends and neighbors on the far-right side of the political spectrum who see immigration as a zero-sum loss for society. But the reality is that a wholesale end to sanctuary policy threatens to break up non-violent, law-abiding, tax-paying family units in a way that is beneath the hallmark ideals of our country. Virtually no one would be comfortable with mass expulsion if forced to observe its effects directly. Finally, the economic reality of declining birth rates and stagflation would only be worsened by a mass expulsion of law-abiding, working, tax-paying residents without lawful immigration status.

At the same time, it is a rudimentary truth that our elected officials have failed to keep the people of Chicago and Cook County safe from violent criminal offenders – migrant or resident. When police-reform advocates refer to bogus data in an attempt to tell us crime is down, it reminds me of the old adage, “figures lie, and liars figure.”

Whether our friends and neighbors on the far-left side of the political spectrum would acknowledge it or not, it is a grim reality that migrants to America – recent or not – can become violent criminal offenders who plainly threaten public safety. These examples manifest themselves in the most tragic ways in cases like Laken Riley’s, but more often lead to an increase in thefts, assaults, or gang-related crimes in urban centers. More crucially, though, a massive, uncontrolled influx of migrants leads to a strain on the financial resources of local, state and federal governments. Simply put, a dollar spent on a migrant shelter cannot also be spent in a neighborhood center.

Today’s immigration issues require so much more from our elected officials than they have provided the people. Half a billion dollars have been spent on supposed migrant programs in Chicago, and less than half of it is spent directly on migrants. Hardly any of it is spent on local Chicago businesses or contractors. Instead, out-of-state companies have taken an enormous chunk of that money, and spent it on over-inflated salaries, over-inflated rents, and substandard dwellings. Imagine how much differently our City residents would feel about the migration issue today if that money was given directly to City residents and businesses that could fashion private market solutions for newcomers. Imagine how much better off Chicago residents would be.

Chicago cannot solve the nation’s immigration problems alone. It is not our responsibility as a city. It is not lawful under the Constitution. The federal government must address the issue directly, through legislation and funding, or, at a bare minimum, by deputizing the States and municipalities to handle migration matters directly. Our city officials worsen the problem when they cling to a policy from almost four decades ago that makes no sense in the broader context of today’s federal “raise the gates” approach. Chicago can set an example for other cities to re-imagine sanctuary policy in a way that reduces the antagonism between local, state, and federal governments on matters of public safety while prioritizing the interests of the residents they are elected to serve.